Montclair School Vote

Understanding the Special Election for Our Schools

Special Election Day Tuesday, December 9, 2025 Polls open 4 PM – 8 PM Vote by mail: application

The Two Ballot Questions

The Montclair Board of Education is holding a special election under N.J.S.A. 18A:22-40 seeking voter approval for two separate questions to address the budget deficit and fund the upcoming school year.

Question #1: 2024-2025 Deficit

Raise an additional $12,600,000

The Montclair Board of Education seeks approval to raise an additional $12,600,000 for the 2024-2025 school year The funds will be used to cover a deficit from the 2024-2025 school year. Approval of these taxes will result in a one-time increase to the district’s tax levy.

Question #2: 2025-2026 Budget

Raise an additional $7,600,000

The Montclair Board of Education seeks approval to raise an additional $7,600,000 for the 2025-2026 school year. Approval of these taxes will result in a permanent increase to the district’s tax levy.

What's at Stake?

Regarding Question #1 ($12.6M)

If Q1 Passes:

The 2024-2025 deficit is covered by a one-time tax increase, and the loan that was already taken out is paid back in full.

If Q1 Fails:

The district keeps the already existing 10-year $12.6M loan from the state. This also triggers the mandatory appointment of a state monitor.

Regarding Question #2 ($7.6M)

If Q2 Passes:

The district can avoid the most severe cuts to staff and programs for 2025-2026. A forensic audit will be conducted. The district will have an additional $7.6M in funding for future years.

If Q2 Fails:

The district takes out a 10-year $7M loan from the state to cover the spring semester of the 2025-2026 school year. This avoids most mid year cuts, but the district will need to make cuts for the 2026-2027 school year over the summer. This also triggers the mandatory appointment of a state monitor.

Potential Cuts for 2026-2027 School Year if Question #2 Fails

The following cuts were outlined by the Superintendent to address the $7M shortfall:

  • Conference and Travel
  • Courtesy Busing
  • Operational Aide Positions (11)
  • Restorative Justice Teachers (8)
  • School Counselors and SACs (7)
  • Secretarial Staff (11.5)
  • Confidential Secretary (1)
  • CO Administrators/Staff (3)
  • Curriculum Support Teachers (22)
  • Reading Interventionist (1)
  • Technology Teachers (7)
  • CST/Related Service Providers (5)
  • MCS Clinicians (4)
  • World Language Teachers (5)
  • Nurses (7)
  • School Resource Officer (1)
  • Various Stipends
  • Reduction of contracts (Imani, etc.)
  • Librarians (2)
  • Kindergarten Paraprofessionals (20)
  • Reduction sports & clubs

Source: Superintendent's Report, Oct. 7, 2025

Tax Implications

The following figures are based on an average assessed home value of $639,630.

Question #1

$1,117.43

(One-Time Payment)

This tax would be assessed once to cover the 2024-2025 deficit.

Question #2

$673.53

(Permanent Annual Increase)

This amount would be added to the tax base permanently and it will be used to fund a one time forensic audit.

Cost Comparison: NO/YES vs. YES/YES

This comparison shows the 10-year tax impact for a home assessed at $639,630.

Vote NO on Q1 / YES on Q2

  • Year 1: $673.53
  • Year 2-10: $673.53

Vote YES on Q1 / YES on Q2

  • Year 1: $1,790.96
  • Year 2-10: $673.53

Calculate Your Own Estimate

Use your home's assessed value (not market value) in these formulas:

Q1 (One-Time): (Your Assessed Value) x 0.00174699

Q2 (Permanent): (Your Assessed Value) x 0.001053

Frequently Asked Questions

How did the district get into this deficit?

According to the district, the deficit grew over several years because the district was spending beyond its means. The budget was not being adhered to, with unbudgeted staff hires, unpaid bills, and other unbudgeted expenses contributing to the problem.

What is a state monitor and what will they do?

A state monitor is appointed by the NJ Commissioner of Education. Their charter is to ensure a balanced budget and maintain state educational standards. They have the power to override the board on financial matters, approve spending, and direct corrective actions. The goal is financial stability, not to ruin the schools or cut to state minimums. As long as the school district has enough tax revenue and can get to a balanced budget, the monitor has no reason to make cuts. Also, the monitor has no reason to raise taxes as long as state minimum standards are met.

Who pays for the state monitor and how much do they cost?

The district pays for the state monitor directly. The rate is $125/hour for up to 32 hours per week, which is a maximum of $208,000 per year. The monitor remains in place until the state loan is repaid. While this figure might seem high, it is relatively small when viewed as interest on a $12.6 million loan (Q1 loan amount).

What is the "interest rate" on the state loan?

The loan itself is interest-free. However, the cost of the mandatory monitor can be seen as "interest." If the monitor costs ~$200K/year, the effective APR on a 10 year $12.6M loan (Q1 loan amount) is roughly 2.9%. This is lower than most mortgage rates.

Can the loan be paid off early and the monitor removed?

Yes, it can be paid off at any time. If, in 5 years, the district is financially stable and wants to remove the monitor, the town could hold another special election to raise the remaining balance (e.g., $6.3 million (Q1 loan balance)) and pay off the loan early. The Commissioner of Education would then remove the monitor. According to the Montclair School District's FAQ, "Monitors remain in place until the loan is repaid."

Will the district lose state aid to pay back the loan?

The loan is paid back by withholding state aid for 10 years. The district will lose $1.26M per year for the loan associated with Q1, $0.7M for the loan associated with Q2, plus 200K (state monitor yearly salary). The total cost of the loan associated with Q1 (witheld aid plus monitor salary) is less than 1% of the school district's total budget. The district could make small efficiency gains to absorb this. In addition, property taxes could be raised to offset the loss of state aid and monitor salary. A $130 tax raise on a $639,630 assessed home offsets the state aid loss and monitor salary for the Q1 loan. $130 is 88% off the full price of Q1, which is $1,117. All budgetary shortfalls associated with Q1 can be avoided by voting No on Q1 and implementing a very modest tax raise next year ($130 on an average priced home).

Will a state monitor impact property values?

There is no evidence of this. Property values in Nutley, a nearby town that was recently assigned a monitor, have increased over the past year based on both Redfin and Zillow data. According to a research paper from the Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service at NYU, fiscal stress labels assigned by New York's fiscal monitoring program have no effect on property values. Property values are primarily driven by school rankings. As long as the schools remain well-funded (dependent on Q2 passing) and educational support services stay intact, the impact should be minimal. The district's financial situation is already public knowledge.

What about the state monitor horror stories from other towns?

Every situation is unique. Almost all of the bad experiences reference towns with huge financial issues and low value tax bases. In those towns, the monitor was forced to do unpopular things in order to get a balanced budget and keep state standards. Those situations do not compare to Montclair.

Will the state monitor raise taxes?

The monitor does have the power to raise taxes, but in all likelihood would only do that if it’s necessary for the schools to maintain state standards. Montclair has plenty of tax revenue to maintain state standards, so it’s unlikely the monitor will raise taxes. The amount by which a monitor can raise taxes is limited by NJ state law.

Will the state monitor cut staff and programs?

The monitor's job is to ensure a balanced budget and maintain state standards. If those two items can be achieved based on the tax revenue, the monitor will have no reason to make any unnecessary cuts. If spending outpaces tax revenue, it is likely that the monitor will ensure cuts happen in order to get a balanced budget. If cuts are necessary, the monitor will likely work jointly with the superintendent to identify those cuts. The monitor does have the power to choose the cuts. As long as the board and superintendent manage operations effectively, the monitor should not need to make any cuts.

Are the financial benefits of the loan associated with Q1 worth the risk of a monitor?

The state is offering a $12.6M interest-free loan. However, it requires funding a state monitor's salary, making the loan's effective cost equivalent to a ~2.9% APR.

This favorable rate would allow taxpayers to keep more money in-hand, rather than paying it all upfront. Taxpayers can take advantage of the time value of money.

This decision is analogous to deciding whether to pay off a mortgage early or keep the mortgage and invest your money elsewhere.

How much would taxpayers save by choosing a 10-year annual payment of $1.46M (monitor salary plus state aid reduction) instead of a one-time payment of $12.6M?

Evaluating the Financial Value of the State's Loan (for evaluative purposes only)

Imagine a joint taxpayer account with $12.6 million, growing at a 7% annual interest rate. This account represents all the bank accounts of all the taxpayers. It's a hypothetical account used to determine the monetary value of the state package. This account is only associated with the taxpayers, and is not tied to the school district. Two courses of action are available: Path one is an immediate, full contribution to the school district. Path two involves ten annual payments of $1.46 million (roughly $130 per taxpayer per year) to compensate the school district for the loan repayment and monitor salary. The benefit of path two is the continued interest accumulation on the account's non-disbursed funds.

Path 1: Pay Upfront

Give the school district the full $12.6M today to clear the deficit.

Result After 10 Years $0
Path 2: Pay Annually (Take Loan)

Pay $1.46M (monitor salary + state aid reduction) from the taxpayer account to the district each year for 10 years, while the remaining balance earns 7% interest.

Result After 10 Years $4.61M

Estimated 10-Year Financial Value

Scenario: A hypothetical $12.6M joint taxpayer account balance growing at a 7% annual return, with a $1.46M annual withdrawal (represents costs to cover state aid loss and monitor salary).

  1. Year 1: ($12.60M * 1.07) - $1.46M = $12.02M
  2. Year 2: ($12.02M * 1.07) - $1.46M = $11.40M
  3. Year 3: ($11.40M * 1.07) - $1.46M = $10.74M
  4. Year 4: ($10.74M * 1.07) - $1.46M = $10.03M
  5. Year 5: ($10.03M * 1.07) - $1.46M = $9.27M
  6. Year 6: ($9.27M * 1.07) - $1.46M = $8.46M
  7. Year 7: ($8.46M * 1.07) - $1.46M = $7.59M
  8. Year 8: ($7.59M * 1.07) - $1.46M = $6.66M
  9. Year 9: ($6.66M * 1.07) - $1.46M = $5.67M
  10. Year 10: ($5.67M * 1.07) - $1.46M = $4.61M

Estimated Net Value After 10 Years: $4.61M
"The central issue is that this financially beneficial loan requires accepting a state monitor."

Your Vote on Q1: A Decision Framework

  • YES

    If you prioritize local control and believe its value is more important than the $4.61M estimated financial benefit.

  • NO

    If you believe the $4.61M financial value outweighs the concern of having a state monitor.

  • NO

    If you believe state oversight is needed anyway (and view the loan as a separate, excellent deal).

What is the community sentiment?

Based on NJMLS data, about 70% of Montclair households do not use public schools. Census data shows that 34% of households earn $100,000 or less annually, making monthly expenses and overall affordability a significant concern for many residents.

Based on our discussions, many voters recognize the importance of Q2 in order to keep Montclair schools properly funded and avoiding major cuts in the summer of 2026. In regards to Q1, many voters welcome some level of oversight because they think it's needed given the district's history of financial mismanagement.

Quotes from the community:

"Why should I pay for Q1 with a high interest credit card when the district can get a much better rate from the state?"

"I want a fiscal monitor." - Mikie Sherrill, Governor-elect

"I value local control, and I am willing to pay a premium to keep it."

Ideas for Future Cost Savings

We want to avoid reductions in force. We hope the district explores all options for efficiency, including:

  • Developing in-house programs for special education students to reduce costly out-of-district tuition fees.
  • Exploring sponsorship and advertising opportunities on district properties and athletic fields.
  • Offering early retirement incentives and not backfilling non-essential positions.
  • Providing voluntary part-time options for staff (e.g., asking two nurses to go part-time rather than laying one off).
  • AI Utilization - Utilize tools like NotebookLM to help gain insights.

Get Involved

Your voice is crucial. Here’s how you can help.

Email us at: [email protected]

Share this website with your neighbors and friends.

Post on social media to raise awareness.

Our Mission

Our goal is to present non-biased facts about the upcoming special election in Montclair. We want our public schools fully funded, and we support public education. We also understand affordability and the reality that many in Montclair cannot afford to bail out the schools. We care about our school district staff members and our kids. We want our kids to have all the resources they need to flourish.